Titre : | Competing One-Way Essential Complements: The Forgotten Side of Net Neutrality | Type de document : | document électronique | Auteurs : | Sébastien Broos, Auteur ; Axel Gauthier, Auteur | Editeur : | Rochester [USA] : Social Science Electronic Publishing | Année de publication : | 2015 | Importance : | 25 p. | Langues : | Anglais | Catégories : | ECONOMIE - Aspects Généraux MEDIAS:AUDIOVISUEL:NUMERIQUE
| Tags : | internet régulation neutralité du net concurrence | Index. décimale : | 004.678 Internet | Résumé : | Présentation sur le site de la LCII :
"The net neutrality debate is at its peak. On February 26, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved new regulations for broadband internet, preserving net neutrality. In this Policy Brief, Sébastien Broos and Axel Gautier analyze the implications of net neutrality with regards to the exclusion of applications that compete with internet service providers’ own products (the phone versus Skype for instance).
They show that a competing application will never be excluded even in the absence of net neutrality. Furthermore, net neutrality can be bad, not only for internet service providers but also for consumers. "
Source : http://local.droit.ulg.ac.be/jcms/service/index.php?serv=69 (Consulté le 31/03/2015)
| Note de contenu : | Résumé proposé par les auteurs :
"We analyze the incentives of internet service providers (ISPs) to break net neutrality by excluding internet applications competing with their own products, a typical example being the exclusion of VoIP applications by telecom companies offering internet and voice services. Exclusion is not a concern when the ISP is a monopoly because it can extract the additional surplus created by the application through price rebalancing. When ISPs compete, it could lead to a fragmented internet where only one firm offers the application. We show that, both in monopoly and duopoly, prohibiting the exclusion of the app and surcharges for its use – a strong form of net neutrality – is not welfare improving."
Source : http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2570924 (Consulté le 31/03/2015) | En ligne : | http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2570924 |
Competing One-Way Essential Complements: The Forgotten Side of Net Neutrality [document électronique] / Sébastien Broos, Auteur ; Axel Gauthier, Auteur . - Rochester (2171 Monroe Avenue, Suite 203, NY 14618, USA) : Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2015 . - 25 p. Langues : Anglais Catégories : | ECONOMIE - Aspects Généraux MEDIAS:AUDIOVISUEL:NUMERIQUE
| Tags : | internet régulation neutralité du net concurrence | Index. décimale : | 004.678 Internet | Résumé : | Présentation sur le site de la LCII :
"The net neutrality debate is at its peak. On February 26, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved new regulations for broadband internet, preserving net neutrality. In this Policy Brief, Sébastien Broos and Axel Gautier analyze the implications of net neutrality with regards to the exclusion of applications that compete with internet service providers’ own products (the phone versus Skype for instance).
They show that a competing application will never be excluded even in the absence of net neutrality. Furthermore, net neutrality can be bad, not only for internet service providers but also for consumers. "
Source : http://local.droit.ulg.ac.be/jcms/service/index.php?serv=69 (Consulté le 31/03/2015)
| Note de contenu : | Résumé proposé par les auteurs :
"We analyze the incentives of internet service providers (ISPs) to break net neutrality by excluding internet applications competing with their own products, a typical example being the exclusion of VoIP applications by telecom companies offering internet and voice services. Exclusion is not a concern when the ISP is a monopoly because it can extract the additional surplus created by the application through price rebalancing. When ISPs compete, it could lead to a fragmented internet where only one firm offers the application. We show that, both in monopoly and duopoly, prohibiting the exclusion of the app and surcharges for its use – a strong form of net neutrality – is not welfare improving."
Source : http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2570924 (Consulté le 31/03/2015) | En ligne : | http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2570924 |
|