Accueil
A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
| Retourner au premier écran avec les dernières notices... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Pierre Larouche |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche2/1 - March 2007 - Special Issue - Further developments in electricity liberalization (Bulletin de Competition and regulation in network industries) / Pierre Larouche
Titre : 2/1 - March 2007 - Special Issue - Further developments in electricity liberalization Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Pierre Larouche, Editeur scientifique ; Damien Gerardin, Editeur scientifique ; François Levêque, Auteur ; Geert Brunekreeft, Auteur ; Balbir Singh, Auteur ; Franco Romerio, Auteur ; Ole Jess Olsen, Auteur ; Anders Larsen, Auteur ; Eirik S. Amundsen, Auteur ; Lars Bergman, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Langues : Anglais Catégories : DROIT
ECONOMIE - Aspects Généraux
PERIODIQUESTags : régulation aspect économique Europe énergie concurrence libéralisation des marchés Index. décimale : 343.07 Droit de la concurrence Note de contenu : TABLE DES MATIÈRES :
Investments in Generation and Transmission (F. Leveque et G. Brunekreeft)
Assessing Regulation of Reliability of Electricity Supply (B. Singh)
Nuclear Energy between Past and Future. An Assessment based on the Concept of Risk (F. Romerio)
The Danish Electricity Reform - Success or Failure? (O.J. Olsen et A. Larsen)
Provision of Operating Reserve Capacity: Principles and Practices on the Nordic Electricity market (E.S. Amundsen et L. Bergman)
En ligne : http://www.crninet.com/table_of_content.aspx?sy=2007&pn=1 [n° ou bulletin] 2/1 - March 2007 - Special Issue - Further developments in electricity liberalization [texte imprimé] / Pierre Larouche, Editeur scientifique ; Damien Gerardin, Editeur scientifique ; François Levêque, Auteur ; Geert Brunekreeft, Auteur ; Balbir Singh, Auteur ; Franco Romerio, Auteur ; Ole Jess Olsen, Auteur ; Anders Larsen, Auteur ; Eirik S. Amundsen, Auteur ; Lars Bergman, Auteur . - 2007.
Langues : Anglais
Catégories : DROIT
ECONOMIE - Aspects Généraux
PERIODIQUESTags : régulation aspect économique Europe énergie concurrence libéralisation des marchés Index. décimale : 343.07 Droit de la concurrence Note de contenu : TABLE DES MATIÈRES :
Investments in Generation and Transmission (F. Leveque et G. Brunekreeft)
Assessing Regulation of Reliability of Electricity Supply (B. Singh)
Nuclear Energy between Past and Future. An Assessment based on the Concept of Risk (F. Romerio)
The Danish Electricity Reform - Success or Failure? (O.J. Olsen et A. Larsen)
Provision of Operating Reserve Capacity: Principles and Practices on the Nordic Electricity market (E.S. Amundsen et L. Bergman)
En ligne : http://www.crninet.com/table_of_content.aspx?sy=2007&pn=1
Titre : 8/4 - December 2007 - Special issue featuring the 2006 Beesley Lectures Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Damien Gerardin, Editeur scientifique ; Pierre Larouche, Editeur scientifique ; Colin Robinson, Auteur ; Sam Peltzman, Auteur ; Martin Cave, Auteur ; Alan Sutherland, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Langues : Anglais Catégories : ECONOMIE - Aspects Généraux
PERIODIQUESTags : Europe régulation aspect économique financement concurrence étude de marché énergie télécommunications Index. décimale : 330 Economie Note de contenu : TABLE DES MATIÈRES :
Foreword. The Beesley Lectures (C. Robinson)
W(h)iter Regulation ? (S. Peltzman)
Broadband regulation in Europe - Present and Future (M.Cave)
The Economics of Energy Security : Is Import Dependence a Problem ?
Efficiency Incentives for Public Sector Monopolies - The Case of Scottish Water)
En ligne : http://www.crninet.com [n° ou bulletin] 8/4 - December 2007 - Special issue featuring the 2006 Beesley Lectures [texte imprimé] / Damien Gerardin, Editeur scientifique ; Pierre Larouche, Editeur scientifique ; Colin Robinson, Auteur ; Sam Peltzman, Auteur ; Martin Cave, Auteur ; Alan Sutherland, Auteur . - 2007.
Langues : Anglais
Catégories : ECONOMIE - Aspects Généraux
PERIODIQUESTags : Europe régulation aspect économique financement concurrence étude de marché énergie télécommunications Index. décimale : 330 Economie Note de contenu : TABLE DES MATIÈRES :
Foreword. The Beesley Lectures (C. Robinson)
W(h)iter Regulation ? (S. Peltzman)
Broadband regulation in Europe - Present and Future (M.Cave)
The Economics of Energy Security : Is Import Dependence a Problem ?
Efficiency Incentives for Public Sector Monopolies - The Case of Scottish Water)
En ligne : http://www.crninet.com Enforcement and judicial review of decisions of national regulatory authorities. A CERRE study / Pierre Larouche
Titre : Enforcement and judicial review of decisions of national regulatory authorities. A CERRE study Type de document : document électronique Auteurs : Pierre Larouche, Auteur ; Xavier Taton, Auteur Editeur : Bruxelles : Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE) Année de publication : 2011 Importance : 182 p. Format : Document électronique Langues : Anglais Catégories : DROIT : Droit européen Tags : régulation Europe rapport législation droit européen Index. décimale : 349.4 Droit européen Résumé : Présentation sur le site de l'éditeur :
"While much attention is given at EU level to the design and operation of National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs), the enforcement and review of NRA decisions has been largely left to the Member States to organize.
With this report, CERRE provides a comprehensive examination of Member State law and practice regarding the enforcement and review of NRA decisions. This report is based on a study of energy, electronic communications and rail regulation in Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK. We review EU and Member State legislation, and the case law of national review courts. We make recommendations based on the best practices we identified.
In general, we found that that the harmonization of substantive law at EU level seems to exert a greater influence on Member State law and practice than the diversity of national procedural laws. Accordingly, the degree of divergence between the Member States under study is more limited than one might have expected at first sight. Furthermore, it is also apparent that Member States have by and large taken a horizontal approach to the design of enforcement and review regimes, since for any Member State, we observed that the solutions tend to converge as between sectors.
As a starting point, the design of the enforcement and review of NRA decisions must find a balance between three policy objectives, namely the protection of the rights of market players and interested parties, the effectiveness of the regulatory regime and the efficiency of the enforcement and review process.
Against that background, we studied 12 key issues. From our study, the following recommendations emerge as to the best practices for the enforcement and review of NRA decisions.
- Enforcement of NRA decisions: It is preferable to give NRAs the power to impose penalties directly for failure to comply with their own decisions (as opposed to a power to act against breaches of the regulatory framework, which would comprise their own decisions).
- Stay of NRA decisions during appeal proceedings: An appeal against an NRA decision should have no automatic or systematic suspensive effect, with the possible exception of appeals against NRA decisions ordering the payment of fines. As compared to the situation some years ago, concerns for the effectiveness of regulation, stemming from excessive use of stays of enforcement, seem to have abated.
- Nature of review court: Member States should allocate the review of NRA decisions to a specialist court (or a specialist body within an existing court). We recommend a horizontal, cross-sector approach in designing the review regime, such that a single court would be responsible across the various sectors, in order to maximalise the chances of cross-fertilisation and synergies between sectors.
- Standing and third-party intervention: Standing to appeal against an NRA decision should be granted to all parties who are affected by the decision, subject perhaps to a requirement that the party has participated in the proceedings before the NRA. Third parties whose interests are affected should be able to join review proceedings. The NRA itself should appear before the review court in order to defend its decision. As long as the review court has the ability to join related proceedings, the study shows that the conduct of proceedings has not been significantly affected by the presence of multiple parties.
- Length of proceedings: In general, review proceedings take long: in observable cases, the average duration has been close to a year and a half. An EU-level benchmark norm on duration might be envisaged. Some Member States do not commit enough resources to the handling of the appeal proceedings; in particular, enough qualified judges should be available.
- Confidential information and business secrets: That information is well protected in all Member States, although procedures vary. The best practice is to allow the review court to gain knowledge of the information, which is then shared with a restricted circle of counsel for the parties to the case, without being available to the parties themselves.
Scope of review. Review courts should be entitled to review all factual, legal and policy issues, as long as the parties to the case brought these issues before the court.
- Investigating powers: Since the NRA file is usually quite extensive and the parties provide the NRA with comprehensive submissions, review courts have not been using much of their current investigating powers in practice. There is no need to increase such powers.
- Standard for review: All review courts should use the same standard for review, namely a full review of issues of law, a broad review of the errors of fact and a marginal review of the exercise of discretion by the NRA.
- Formal or substantive analysis: If marginal review is the standard, where the NRA enjoys discretion, substantive analysis would best suit review proceedings. In any event, multiple-stage review (because a review of the substance would be pre-empted by a first stage of formal review) should be avoided.
- EU-level coordination: Cross-fertilisation is lacking as between the various sectors and the various jurisdictions under study. A complete and coherent case-law database on NRA review should be established, and the various Member State courts discharging the review of NRA decisions should be regrouped in a European association, on the model of the Association of European Competition Law Judges.
- Retroactive effect of remedies upon review: It is difficult to choose between the ex tunc and ex nunc models, i.e. to decide whether the remedies granted by review courts should have retroactive effect or not. On balance, leaving aside dogmatic considerations arising from one or the other national legal system, it would be preferable, from a pragmatic perspective, not to give retroactive effect to the remedies granted by the review court (be it quashing of the NRA decision or substitution of a new decision by the review court).
It must be underlined that these questions are interrelated, so that for instance the risks linked with not giving retroactive effect to the remedies granted by the review court would be minimized by a shorter duration of review proceedings.
Ultimately, even when the regime of enforcement and review of NRA decisions is optimally designed and operated, this is but one of the elements which contributes to the success of regulation. Other measures can be taken to increase the quality of NRA decisions ex ante (better procedures before the NRA, adequate resources, etc.), so as to reduce the need for review and thereby procure even greater improvements in the effectiveness of regulation."
Source : http://www.cerre.eu/activities/studies (Consulté le 09/07/2012)En ligne : http://www.cerre.eu/studies/enforcement-and-judicial-review-decisions-nras Enforcement and judicial review of decisions of national regulatory authorities. A CERRE study [document électronique] / Pierre Larouche, Auteur ; Xavier Taton, Auteur . - Bruxelles (42 rue de l'Industrie - Bte 6, 1040) : Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE), 2011 . - 182 p. ; Document électronique.
Langues : Anglais
Catégories : DROIT : Droit européen Tags : régulation Europe rapport législation droit européen Index. décimale : 349.4 Droit européen Résumé : Présentation sur le site de l'éditeur :
"While much attention is given at EU level to the design and operation of National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs), the enforcement and review of NRA decisions has been largely left to the Member States to organize.
With this report, CERRE provides a comprehensive examination of Member State law and practice regarding the enforcement and review of NRA decisions. This report is based on a study of energy, electronic communications and rail regulation in Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK. We review EU and Member State legislation, and the case law of national review courts. We make recommendations based on the best practices we identified.
In general, we found that that the harmonization of substantive law at EU level seems to exert a greater influence on Member State law and practice than the diversity of national procedural laws. Accordingly, the degree of divergence between the Member States under study is more limited than one might have expected at first sight. Furthermore, it is also apparent that Member States have by and large taken a horizontal approach to the design of enforcement and review regimes, since for any Member State, we observed that the solutions tend to converge as between sectors.
As a starting point, the design of the enforcement and review of NRA decisions must find a balance between three policy objectives, namely the protection of the rights of market players and interested parties, the effectiveness of the regulatory regime and the efficiency of the enforcement and review process.
Against that background, we studied 12 key issues. From our study, the following recommendations emerge as to the best practices for the enforcement and review of NRA decisions.
- Enforcement of NRA decisions: It is preferable to give NRAs the power to impose penalties directly for failure to comply with their own decisions (as opposed to a power to act against breaches of the regulatory framework, which would comprise their own decisions).
- Stay of NRA decisions during appeal proceedings: An appeal against an NRA decision should have no automatic or systematic suspensive effect, with the possible exception of appeals against NRA decisions ordering the payment of fines. As compared to the situation some years ago, concerns for the effectiveness of regulation, stemming from excessive use of stays of enforcement, seem to have abated.
- Nature of review court: Member States should allocate the review of NRA decisions to a specialist court (or a specialist body within an existing court). We recommend a horizontal, cross-sector approach in designing the review regime, such that a single court would be responsible across the various sectors, in order to maximalise the chances of cross-fertilisation and synergies between sectors.
- Standing and third-party intervention: Standing to appeal against an NRA decision should be granted to all parties who are affected by the decision, subject perhaps to a requirement that the party has participated in the proceedings before the NRA. Third parties whose interests are affected should be able to join review proceedings. The NRA itself should appear before the review court in order to defend its decision. As long as the review court has the ability to join related proceedings, the study shows that the conduct of proceedings has not been significantly affected by the presence of multiple parties.
- Length of proceedings: In general, review proceedings take long: in observable cases, the average duration has been close to a year and a half. An EU-level benchmark norm on duration might be envisaged. Some Member States do not commit enough resources to the handling of the appeal proceedings; in particular, enough qualified judges should be available.
- Confidential information and business secrets: That information is well protected in all Member States, although procedures vary. The best practice is to allow the review court to gain knowledge of the information, which is then shared with a restricted circle of counsel for the parties to the case, without being available to the parties themselves.
Scope of review. Review courts should be entitled to review all factual, legal and policy issues, as long as the parties to the case brought these issues before the court.
- Investigating powers: Since the NRA file is usually quite extensive and the parties provide the NRA with comprehensive submissions, review courts have not been using much of their current investigating powers in practice. There is no need to increase such powers.
- Standard for review: All review courts should use the same standard for review, namely a full review of issues of law, a broad review of the errors of fact and a marginal review of the exercise of discretion by the NRA.
- Formal or substantive analysis: If marginal review is the standard, where the NRA enjoys discretion, substantive analysis would best suit review proceedings. In any event, multiple-stage review (because a review of the substance would be pre-empted by a first stage of formal review) should be avoided.
- EU-level coordination: Cross-fertilisation is lacking as between the various sectors and the various jurisdictions under study. A complete and coherent case-law database on NRA review should be established, and the various Member State courts discharging the review of NRA decisions should be regrouped in a European association, on the model of the Association of European Competition Law Judges.
- Retroactive effect of remedies upon review: It is difficult to choose between the ex tunc and ex nunc models, i.e. to decide whether the remedies granted by review courts should have retroactive effect or not. On balance, leaving aside dogmatic considerations arising from one or the other national legal system, it would be preferable, from a pragmatic perspective, not to give retroactive effect to the remedies granted by the review court (be it quashing of the NRA decision or substitution of a new decision by the review court).
It must be underlined that these questions are interrelated, so that for instance the risks linked with not giving retroactive effect to the remedies granted by the review court would be minimized by a shorter duration of review proceedings.
Ultimately, even when the regime of enforcement and review of NRA decisions is optimally designed and operated, this is but one of the elements which contributes to the success of regulation. Other measures can be taken to increase the quality of NRA decisions ex ante (better procedures before the NRA, adequate resources, etc.), so as to reduce the need for review and thereby procure even greater improvements in the effectiveness of regulation."
Source : http://www.cerre.eu/activities/studies (Consulté le 09/07/2012)En ligne : http://www.cerre.eu/studies/enforcement-and-judicial-review-decisions-nras Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 1003478 5 LAR ENF Document numérique Internet Documentaires Disponible
Titre : Independence, accountability and perceived quality of regulators Type de document : document électronique Auteurs : Pierre Larouche, Auteur ; Chris Hanretty, Auteur ; Andreas Reindl, Auteur Editeur : Bruxelles : Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE) Année de publication : 2012 Importance : 95 p. Format : Langues : Anglais Catégories : MEDIAS Tags : régulation médias Index. décimale : 302.234 Cinéma, radio, télévision (média) Résumé : "A specific EU model for national regulatory authorities (NRAs) has evolved in the course of the liberalization processes in network industries (electronic communications, energy and others). It rests on two broad lines: NRAs are independent and accountable.
The CERRE Report on Independence and Accountability of national regulatory authorities (NRAs) provides empirical backing for that model, using a sample of NRAs from three sectors (energy, telecommunications and rail) plus the national competition authorities, and five member states (Belgium, Netherlands, France, Germany and the United Kingdom).
In their report, CERRE researchers compile an index of independence, towards market parties and most importantly towards the legislative and executive powers. They also develop a new index of accountability, comprising the main elements that define accountability towards market parties, the legislative and executive powers, the European Commission, the courts and peers. These two indexes are then analysed against an index of perceived quality of the work of NRAs."Note de contenu : Table des matières abrégée :
1. Background
2. Independence
3. Accountability
4. Perceived Quality
5. Empirical links between independence, accountability and perceived quality
6. Conclusions and policy recommendationsIndependence, accountability and perceived quality of regulators [document électronique] / Pierre Larouche, Auteur ; Chris Hanretty, Auteur ; Andreas Reindl, Auteur . - Bruxelles (42 rue de l'Industrie - Bte 6, 1040) : Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE), 2012 . - 95 p. ; Pdf.
Langues : Anglais
Catégories : MEDIAS Tags : régulation médias Index. décimale : 302.234 Cinéma, radio, télévision (média) Résumé : "A specific EU model for national regulatory authorities (NRAs) has evolved in the course of the liberalization processes in network industries (electronic communications, energy and others). It rests on two broad lines: NRAs are independent and accountable.
The CERRE Report on Independence and Accountability of national regulatory authorities (NRAs) provides empirical backing for that model, using a sample of NRAs from three sectors (energy, telecommunications and rail) plus the national competition authorities, and five member states (Belgium, Netherlands, France, Germany and the United Kingdom).
In their report, CERRE researchers compile an index of independence, towards market parties and most importantly towards the legislative and executive powers. They also develop a new index of accountability, comprising the main elements that define accountability towards market parties, the legislative and executive powers, the European Commission, the courts and peers. These two indexes are then analysed against an index of perceived quality of the work of NRAs."Note de contenu : Table des matières abrégée :
1. Background
2. Independence
3. Accountability
4. Perceived Quality
5. Empirical links between independence, accountability and perceived quality
6. Conclusions and policy recommendationsRéservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 1003439 6 LAR IND Document numérique Internet Documentaires Disponible Net Neutrality in Europe – La neutralité de l'Internet en Europe / Alain Strowel
Titre : Net Neutrality in Europe – La neutralité de l'Internet en Europe Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alain Strowel, Editeur scientifique ; Laurent De Muyter, Auteur ; Yves Desmedt, Auteur ; Emmanuel Derieux, Auteur ; Rob Frieden, Auteur ; Pierre Larouche, Auteur ; Robert Queck, Auteur ; Maxime Piron, Auteur ; Michel Van Bellinghen, Auteur ; Tania Zgajewski, Auteur Editeur : Bruxelles [Belgique] : Bruylant Année de publication : 2013 Collection : Idées d'Europe Importance : 208 p. ISBN/ISSN/EAN : 978-2-8027-3968-5 Langues : Français Catégories : DROIT
EUROPE
MEDIAS:AUDIOVISUEL:NUMERIQUETags : Europe internet neutralité du net législation régulation Index. décimale : 349.4 Droit européen Résumé : Présentation par l'éditeur :
"La neutralité de l’Internet requiert de garantir aux usagers un accès égal à tous les services et contenus en ligne. En pratique, la gestion du trafic oblige les opérateurs à différencier certains paquets d’information circulant sur les réseaux, par exemple pour lutter contre les messages indésirables. Parfois le traitement différencié des contenus engendre des discriminations non justifiées. Ainsi, en est-il si un opérateur en place dégrade un service concurrent de téléphonie sur Internet, tel que Skype. Le droit de la concurrence permet a priori de sanctionner un tel comportement anti-concurrentiel. Mais cela suffit-il à assurer la neutralité des réseaux ?
Par ailleurs, l’augmentation rapide du trafic et l’ampleur des investissements à faire dans les infrastructures du futur incitent les opérateurs à limiter les débits de base, tout en garantissant la qualité de services spécialisés, par exemple de vidéoconférence. Cette différenciation des offres a un prix. On s’éloigne du principe originel de l’Internet qui veut que toutes les communications soient traitées de la même manière. Depuis quelques années, des académiques et pionniers de l’Internet dénoncent le risque d’un Internet « à plusieurs vitesses ». Aujourd’hui, les voix des consommateurs se font entendre. Faut-il adopter une législation spécifique ?
Le cadre actuel des télécommunications en Europe suffit-il pour garantir la neutralité ? Mais d’abord, comment définir la neutralité de l’Internet ?
Telles sont quelques-unes des questions que cet ouvrage examine à un moment où la neutralité de l’Internet revient dans l’actualité. En juin 2013, la Commission européenne a en effet affiché sa volonté de légiférer en la matière. Le présent recueil de contributions vient donc à point nommé."
Source : http://fr.bruylant.larciergroup.com (Consulté le 24/04/2014)Note de contenu :
Table des matières abrégée :
Introduction : une législation européenne sur la neutralité de l’Internet, entre la préservation d’un droit fondamental d’accès et la nécessaire régulation des réseaux
– Net Neutrality : What Regulation For the Internet in Europe and Beyond ?
– The Debate Over Network Neutrality in the United States,
– Net Neutrality – From Catch-all to Catch-22 ?
– Five Neglected Issues About Network Neutrality,
– La neutralité d’internet : l’approche prudente de l’Europe,
– La neutralité de l’internet, la gestion du trafic et les services gérés : à la recherche de définitions,
– Neutralité et responsabilité des intermédiaires de l’internet,
AnnexesEn ligne : http://fr.bruylant.larciergroup.com/titres/128387_2/net-neutrality-in-europe-la- [...] Net Neutrality in Europe – La neutralité de l'Internet en Europe [texte imprimé] / Alain Strowel, Editeur scientifique ; Laurent De Muyter, Auteur ; Yves Desmedt, Auteur ; Emmanuel Derieux, Auteur ; Rob Frieden, Auteur ; Pierre Larouche, Auteur ; Robert Queck, Auteur ; Maxime Piron, Auteur ; Michel Van Bellinghen, Auteur ; Tania Zgajewski, Auteur . - Bruxelles (67 Rue de la Régence, 1000, Belgique) : Bruylant, 2013 . - 208 p.. - (Idées d'Europe) .
ISBN : 978-2-8027-3968-5
Langues : Français
Catégories : DROIT
EUROPE
MEDIAS:AUDIOVISUEL:NUMERIQUETags : Europe internet neutralité du net législation régulation Index. décimale : 349.4 Droit européen Résumé : Présentation par l'éditeur :
"La neutralité de l’Internet requiert de garantir aux usagers un accès égal à tous les services et contenus en ligne. En pratique, la gestion du trafic oblige les opérateurs à différencier certains paquets d’information circulant sur les réseaux, par exemple pour lutter contre les messages indésirables. Parfois le traitement différencié des contenus engendre des discriminations non justifiées. Ainsi, en est-il si un opérateur en place dégrade un service concurrent de téléphonie sur Internet, tel que Skype. Le droit de la concurrence permet a priori de sanctionner un tel comportement anti-concurrentiel. Mais cela suffit-il à assurer la neutralité des réseaux ?
Par ailleurs, l’augmentation rapide du trafic et l’ampleur des investissements à faire dans les infrastructures du futur incitent les opérateurs à limiter les débits de base, tout en garantissant la qualité de services spécialisés, par exemple de vidéoconférence. Cette différenciation des offres a un prix. On s’éloigne du principe originel de l’Internet qui veut que toutes les communications soient traitées de la même manière. Depuis quelques années, des académiques et pionniers de l’Internet dénoncent le risque d’un Internet « à plusieurs vitesses ». Aujourd’hui, les voix des consommateurs se font entendre. Faut-il adopter une législation spécifique ?
Le cadre actuel des télécommunications en Europe suffit-il pour garantir la neutralité ? Mais d’abord, comment définir la neutralité de l’Internet ?
Telles sont quelques-unes des questions que cet ouvrage examine à un moment où la neutralité de l’Internet revient dans l’actualité. En juin 2013, la Commission européenne a en effet affiché sa volonté de légiférer en la matière. Le présent recueil de contributions vient donc à point nommé."
Source : http://fr.bruylant.larciergroup.com (Consulté le 24/04/2014)Note de contenu :
Table des matières abrégée :
Introduction : une législation européenne sur la neutralité de l’Internet, entre la préservation d’un droit fondamental d’accès et la nécessaire régulation des réseaux
– Net Neutrality : What Regulation For the Internet in Europe and Beyond ?
– The Debate Over Network Neutrality in the United States,
– Net Neutrality – From Catch-all to Catch-22 ?
– Five Neglected Issues About Network Neutrality,
– La neutralité d’internet : l’approche prudente de l’Europe,
– La neutralité de l’internet, la gestion du trafic et les services gérés : à la recherche de définitions,
– Neutralité et responsabilité des intermédiaires de l’internet,
AnnexesEn ligne : http://fr.bruylant.larciergroup.com/titres/128387_2/net-neutrality-in-europe-la- [...] Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 1003831 8 STR NET Livre Bibliothèque Documentaires Disponible
